Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
sudhakar682
Topic Author
Posts: 7
Joined: June 24th, 2003, 5:32 pm

TIPS

June 30th, 2005, 6:40 pm

Does it make sense for the TIPS (Treasury inflation protected securities) Index to be less price volatile than the Lehman Aggregate bond index in high inflation environments? Any comments would be highly appreciated. Thanks,
 
User avatar
PeteJ
Posts: 0
Joined: January 3rd, 2003, 12:06 pm

TIPS

July 1st, 2005, 8:02 am

I think it makes sense for TIPS index to have a lower volatility in virtually any environment. Reasoning behind this is simply that real yield tends to be more stable than nominal yield (real + inflation expectation). Of course the volatility also depends on the maturities of the bonds (I'm not sure if you can easily define a duration for TIPS).
 
User avatar
daveangel
Posts: 5
Joined: October 20th, 2003, 4:05 pm

TIPS

July 1st, 2005, 8:24 am

if you think about it then it should be obvious that TIPS should be less volatile than nominal bonds... the only thing that moves the TIP is the real interest rate. A nominal yield is is according the fisher theory a combination of real yields plus an inflation expectation... both volatile and one would argue positively correlated.
knowledge comes, wisdom lingers
 
User avatar
JackInTheBox
Posts: 0
Joined: August 12th, 2002, 11:38 am

TIPS

July 5th, 2005, 6:18 pm

Why must inflation expectation be positively correlated with nominal rates? Args can be made for rising rates to lower inflation expectation and vice versa. Therefore on a balanced basis, the correlation may just be zero.
 
User avatar
zebbo
Posts: 0
Joined: April 5th, 2005, 7:24 pm

TIPS

July 6th, 2005, 10:24 am

I thought we have nominal rate = real rate+inflation expectation+risk premium?I don't know if it helps, but I worked on a model where inflation linked bonds could be more volatile than nominal bonds, and it depended on the correlations plugegd in the model...