November 18th, 2008, 10:11 am
I do not think age is an issue of itself because directly it rarely is the problem.This is a line of work where many enter after a PhD, so the average is 27ish, 30 is not even outside the first moment.I know people who started successfully in the 40's and one CQF alumnus did it (as I recall) >50, and is now a head of risk at a firm you will have heard of.The issue is how you spent the time. That applies at 22 through to 62.Kevin08's path is not all that off the mainstream. But there is a risk of becoming what is seen as an education junkie. We have a surprising number of people on our database who have 3 masters degrees.That implies a lack of focus or direction. Not always the case, as I have found when speaking with these people, but your resume looks the way it looks.Chances of getting the Oxford/Cambridge gig seem to me small. By all means try, but it would be dangerously risky to make it a plan.With all due respect, your English is not strong. That worries me a bit given you have 4 to 6 years education in the USA.But the numerical work you have done sounds good, and the stats from an Ivy league is of course useful.My ultimate answer is not really one you're going to like I fear.You need to keep on applying for jobs, wait for it to happen. Give it a year, then if that fails take a job in industry or education.Apply to software houses, ratings agencies etc as well.Use the downtime well. Having read your posts, you almost certainly need to completely re-write your CV. When you've done that, get a native English speaker to go over it, then write it again.Use the downtime well. You don't mention programming. You're obviously reasonably smart, so go learn C++Find holes in your skill set, do brainteasers, and look particularly hard at those involving probability.