July 18th, 2009, 9:21 am
QuoteOriginally posted by: DominicConnorI think that's an acceptably "hot" topic, my suggestion is that you've not presented an approach that is mathematical enough.I think this a weird problem in academic research. The solution has to be technical enough to be impressive but tractable enough to be solvable. Some papers appears to be neat theory looking for an application more than an application looking for neat theory.QuoteOriginally posted by: epon79Hi All,I recently presented my initial idea for my thesis and was told I do not have enough mathematical content.Was initially going to build a trading system with regime swithching (mainly due to the number of jobs wityhin algorithmic trading at the minute).It might be worthwhile if you reframe the question ? How do you detect a regime-swicth ? How vulnerable is the trading system to wrong detectors ? Can you improve correct identification of a regime ? What are the consequenses of being wrong ? How does any of these 4 change the optimal solution ? But you also have to be careful, if it ends up being technical analysis this would be shunned in academia
Last edited by
hhhmmm on July 17th, 2009, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.