Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
eljefe
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: June 22nd, 2009, 8:24 am

Hull-White relation

January 8th, 2010, 10:48 pm

HiTrying to figure out if the relation r(t) = x(t)+alpha(t) from page 74 in Brigo & Mercurio still holds under the forward measure ?
 
User avatar
manolom
Posts: 0
Joined: March 14th, 2006, 2:52 pm

Hull-White relation

January 9th, 2010, 8:27 pm

both sides of the equation are random vars. => taking expectation under any measure would lead to both expectations being equal. Remember also that expectation is linear.
 
User avatar
eljefe
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: June 22nd, 2009, 8:24 am

Hull-White relation

January 9th, 2010, 8:54 pm

QuoteOriginally posted by: manolomboth sides of the equation are random vars. => taking expectation under any measure would lead to both expectations being equal. Remember also that expectation is linear.Hi.. Thank you for replying :-)Not quite sure if I understand the answer however. Are you saying that x(t) under the forward measure can be found by x(t)=r(t)-alpha(t) ??Again thank you for your help
 
User avatar
ikeuchi
Posts: 0
Joined: November 14th, 2009, 1:42 pm

Hull-White relation

January 11th, 2010, 11:09 am

x(t) changes and the relation holds. but it is short rate under fwd meas. see B&M 3.2.1 and 3.8.