Several details are here:
Forex-tsd about spectra
https://www.forex-tsd.com/forum/debates ... ion/page67
1). RenTec is not predicting the price. Price is too random for their algos. They predict the prediction of price. They trade futures. The futures price is the result of numerous decisions made by a number of humans, using their "visions" AND usual trading tools: Moving Averages etc.2). Visions of all traders and money managers on Wall Street are "analogous". They are smooth like a sound of music. Therefore the futures are more smooth than regular direct (random) prices.3). Trading tools on Wall Street are deep "analogous" too, they are too much like digital filters.4). Therefore, while RenTec cannot predict direct random price, they CAN predict the futures (semi-analogous "signal") - by using very special spectral DSP methods. Additionally, futures allow them to leverage.5). I suggest nobody in RenTec holds the whole picture of algos' chain, except Simons.5). The two main problems with spectral DSP are:(a) modern methods can not exctract spectrum from a "signal" (the price) correctly,(b) modern DSP methods can not predict the dance (the change) of price spectrum correctly,and(c) advanced methods by RenTec are unusual and VERY computing-power hungry for the real mode operations.6). For the solution of (5b) RenTec hired specialists on speech recognition from IBM.7). For the solution of (5a) they use very exotic DSP methods from VERY distant (from Wall Street) area of science. I think they started from the Simons' job at crypto, because they had to CHECK crypto long ago by some de-crypto methods. Simons does not use crypto, he started from the use of de-crypto technique, developed earlier for the avaluation of crypto power. He first has "decrypted" the price timeseries. Now they use algos from physics, and then if physics algos fail they use old de-crypto algos.8). For the solution of (5c) they built the best in industry IT dept.9). All above is almost useless without very special trick needed to DSP-ing processing of price timeseries. It is not described in books. I dont know how they do it. Maybe they dont use it at all - that is why we can see drawdowns in their returns, when the markets gone totally random."Bad news (4) I have no intention and I will not dig deeply into it here. You have to have Simons' scientists level to implement "cycle extraction" correctly. Do not take it personally.Bad news (5). Forex's signals are the most RANDOM among all type of price quotings.That is why the "cycle extraction" in forex prices' stream is the most difficult. That is why retail forex brokers are beleiving that most of novice forex traders will fail by ANY trading method or combination of trading methods, otherwise profitable in other trading areas: futures, options etc."...................."...Let me repeat by other words: you can obtain the "spectrum" of the "signal" by incorrect Fourier method or other way. If the signal is stable within the longest period in spectrum, then you can easily extrapolate the same spectrum into the future. That is the way the "Extrapolator" from MQL codebase works.But if your "signal" has a spectrum which is changing over time - then you need a "dance" of the spectrum - this is "spectrum of spectrum" or somewhere called "Cepstrum" - a dynamic representation of spectra's changes over time. Once you have got a cepstrum, you can extrapolate it to get future spectrum, then you can extrapolate spectrum for the future time, and then you can extrapolate the "signal" - the price.The faster the spectrum changes the more difficult to get the "cepstrum".That is what usually the speech recognition engineers are dealing with. This is much more difficult task for engineers, than simple spectra extraction. That is the main difficulty in what the Forex is a champion.Even if you got a cepstrum, and a spectrum, you cannot be sure that this your so-called "spectrum estimation" - a "probable suggestion" in simple words - is correct. Therefore you must periodically return to cepstrums, obtained and refused earlier by your program (by some reasons) - in order to correct your trading system. As I understand Simons and RenTec solved this problem by using VERY exotic approach - they hired as a chief scientist one on the main specialists in so-called "returning functions". And they always optimize obtained cepstums ans spectrums as to the new turns of the market. They never sure that the spectra they use at the moment for predicting the futue - is correct.You see? No place for amateurs. This is a very serious math job. "---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Besides, I was swiftly *banned* on stupid "atomic hvinancy" web-site for this detailed explanation in their RenTec thread. Probably, RenTec & Simons gave them a huge bribe to do that. RenTec secret