April 7th, 2013, 1:42 am
From my experience: yes and no.When it comes to plain vanilla options, then usually yes for pricing purposes. Banks usually have a system that constantly fits some parametric form or model to the Black-Scholes implied volatility smiles for the different maturities. When it then comes to quoting plain vanilla options, they just have to interpolate the resulting surface and use Black-Scholes to get the price. Nothing is lost this way since the volatility surface for any maturity incorporates all deviations from normality that are relevant for European payoffs. They might even do their real-time delta hedges based on the Black-Scholes delta, recompute the greeks under a more realistic model less frequently and keep track of the difference.For exotic options it is a clear no. I don't think anybody uses still Black-Scholes to price options with strong path dependence (e.g. barrier). However, when there is a need to the real-time market making of these products, then you need a closed-form solution and one common approach is again to price less frequently under a more realistic model, compute the deviation to some simple model with a closed-form solution (such as Black-Scholes) and then quote the options based on the price from the simple model plus a shift (i.e. the same thing that you do for the delta of vanillas).
Last edited by
LocalVolatility on April 6th, 2013, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.