January 15th, 2004, 2:10 pm
I've only come across a couple, so my sample may be biased.They seem more pleasant to work in than most trading environments. They think of themselves as clever, meaning that they value their employees a bit more than banks who think the value is added more by the firm than the individual. They seem more friendly, and considerably less aggressive than many trading environments. There is a bit of an air of "not only am I senior to you, but smarter". At some banks more senior people actually effect to sound stupid in order to project an air of authority and status.They are weak on process. This is good because this is less bureaucracy, but it does mean that important things don't actually happen. It also means that "It didn't work even though I did the right things" works better as a reason at a bank than a HF.Smaller outfits in my experience are worse at supporting growth than larger ones. In a big firm, there is some chance of there being cover for when you're studying, but this applies less to smaller outfits. Growth is also an issue in smaller firms due to the fact that there may be only one logical step up, so you're waiting for someone to die.However, specific commitments with dates, in writing, are better in a small firm than a large one. When you come to take your option to study or whatever, a small firm has the merit that you are talking to the guy who made the promise. People are more reluctant to break their own word than say "policy on training has changed, sorry."