January 4th, 2005, 6:45 pm
Leverage is possibly one of the most useless measures of risk that hedge fund investors harp on about. There is no one definition and when you are dealing with a portfolio of positions in equities, fi and fx it is pretty hard to come up with a measure of leverage that is satisfactory.Lets look at your specific case. Your portfolio is a long/short stock position possibly with a few options. Lets say you have $100mm under management and the gross value of your longs is $300mm and the gross value of your short positions is $200mm. On a gross basis you are 5x leveraged. On a net basis your leverage is 1x. Which of the two measures is correct ? I dont know but I would warrant that neither gives you an idea of how much risk you have. To net the position I have assumed a correlation of 1. In reality the correlation is going to be less than that. So your true leverage is somewhere between 1 and 5.If you have options in your portfolio then use the otpions delta to calculate an equivalent position in the underlying and then add that to your gross position.As you can probably I guess I am not a big fan of leverage as a measure of risk in a portfolio. I am more in favour of using a VaR approach (with all its shortcomings) as a risk measure than leverage.My 2cents worth.
knowledge comes, wisdom lingers