Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
lifo
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: February 29th, 2004, 6:57 am

lognormals

August 6th, 2005, 10:51 am

I'm trying to figure out summing lognormals...If you have lognormal stock prices, and create a basket of 100 stocks, the basket price should be lognormal too, right? Yet I hear it said that lognormals sum to normals.What about perfectly correlated lognormals: dX_1 = X_1*dW dX_2 = 2 *X_2*dWThen what will the distribution of (X_1+X_2) look like? It seems like it has to be a lognormal, but how can you calculate it?
 
User avatar
DavidJN
Posts: 262
Joined: July 14th, 2002, 3:00 am

lognormals

August 6th, 2005, 1:14 pm

The lognormal is closed under addition. Products of lognormalsare lognormal. Sums of lognormals are not lognormal. I doubtsums of lognormals are normal, either.
 
User avatar
mj
Posts: 12
Joined: December 20th, 2001, 12:32 pm

lognormals

August 6th, 2005, 3:19 pm

if you sum enough independent things, it will look normal. Sums of lognormals are not anything nice in general, however.
 
User avatar
lifo
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: February 29th, 2004, 6:57 am

lognormals

August 6th, 2005, 11:19 pm

Thanks MJ and DavidJN. So the S&P should have a more or less normal distribution then? A bit distorted, perhaps, due to some correlation? For perfect correlations, this goes against my intuition for how a good model should behave. I'm going to have to do some simulating to satisfy my curiosity...
 
User avatar
mj
Posts: 12
Joined: December 20th, 2001, 12:32 pm

lognormals

August 7th, 2005, 12:24 pm

for the S&P, the constituents are correlated so the basket need not become normal. it's a definite issue in math finance that we expect both baskets and their constituents to be lognormal
 
User avatar
nyamazani
Posts: 0
Joined: February 22nd, 2005, 5:07 pm

lognormals

August 8th, 2005, 8:02 am

There is quite a lot in the literature about summing lognormals esp. with a view to pricing baskets. You can get quite tight bounds using comonotonicity and conditioning, but no closed forms.