November 7th, 2006, 10:04 am
1) Depends on v and V. If you mean v=V, then it still depends on your reference frame. You can't just state velocities without reference. If we choose a common reference frame (the workbench say) then if the ant is moving at the same speed as the end of the band then it will never reach the end. If however v>V, for example because the ant is walking at a speed v relative to the band locally (i.e. its "leg speed") then clearly it can reach the end since it is now moving faster than V for all positions along the band.2) Firstly who says there are bounds? Main stream theories all point to there being no bound to reach. However, your "analogy" can be solved without considering the full extent of the universe. Suppose we define a large arbitrary sphere a distance D from us, and we attempt to leave that sphere. Then by our analogy above we have to travel at the speed that the boundary is moving away or faster. Make D large enough and this speed exceeds the speed of light. The hubble constant is about 70km/s/MPc and the speed of light is 300,000 km/s so we need D to be 4285Mpc or about 14,000,000,000 light years. This is the extent of the "observable universe" or hubble radius. There is no reason to believe that the universe stops there, because that would make our position in the universe special - our neighbour in andromeda galaxy would be close enough to the boundary that they could reach it (or even see it with a telescope). The result is that some parts of the universe are expanding away from each other faster than the speed of light.
Last edited by
MikeCrowe on November 6th, 2006, 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.