QuoteOriginally posted by: asdfasdfQuoteIf you really want to define, you have to make sure your definition is "operational", that you can measure, For this reason, in the US a recession is defined as a DECLINE in any country's gross domestic product (GDP), or negative real economic growth, for two or more successive quarters of a year. You can define it in an infine number of different ways, but if you want your analyses to be relevant, you'd probably want to stick with the more accepted assumption There is no strict definition of the word "recession". In the U.S., there's a recession if a group called "The Business Cycle Dating Committee" at the NBER decides that we're having (or we had) one. Usually, this decision is made well into (or even after) the recession, so it's not all that useful. The two quarter rule is pretty standard and hence strict. The reason it takes a while to decide is that (a) GDP is published with a lag and (b) revised after publication. The longer it has been published the smaller the likely future revision is; so the error bars shrink with time. Hence unless GDP falls by more than x standard error's it could be a few months / years before we know for sure wether there was a recession or not.From the NBER website:The NBER does not define a recession in terms of two consecutive quarters of decline in real GDP. Rather, a recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales. For more information, see the latest announcement on how the NBER's Business Cycle Dating Committee chooses turning points in the Economy and its latest memo, dated 07/17/03.
http://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.htmlThe main problem with the negative GDP condition is that real GDP growth could be negative even when the economy is booming. For example, a huge inventory drawdown in response to a positive demand shock would do it.