Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
Tim111
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 4th, 2008, 3:00 pm

CIR model and the Feller condition

May 4th, 2008, 4:13 pm

Hello all,I have been working with the CIR interest rate model where,dr(t) = alpha(mew-r(t))dt + sigma.sqrt(r(t))dWtand using the bond pricing PDE,(dF/dt)+0.5.r.(sigma^2)(d2F/dr2) + (alpha(mew-r)-lambda.r)(dF/dr)-rF = 0I have been trying to derive the Feller condition, (2.alpha.mew)/sigma^2 > 1Where F = Ar^gamma and solving for gamma.(dF/dt)=0 (dF/dr)=gamma.A.r^gamma-1(d2F/dr2)=gamma(gamma-1)Ar^gamma-2I have been really struggling to get the final result out after substituting the PDEs into the bond pricing PDE as I don't really know were to go from there.Any help would be hugely appreciated,Tim
Last edited by Tim111 on May 3rd, 2008, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
Alan
Posts: 3050
Joined: December 19th, 2001, 4:01 am
Location: California
Contact:

CIR model and the Feller condition

May 5th, 2008, 1:44 pm

Since no one has answered, here is my two cents.The purpose of the Feller condition is to answer the question:For what parameters is the boundary r = 0 reachable by the process r(t) in finite expected time?There is a well-developed technology for answering such questions for -any- time-homogenous 1D diffusion, using the so-called scale and speed measures. To learn about all that, read Karlin & Taylor's, "A Second Course in Stochastic Processes" regards,
 
User avatar
srioae
Posts: 0
Joined: January 19th, 2005, 2:21 pm

CIR model and the Feller condition

June 3rd, 2008, 1:57 pm

well you put in your solution to the original PDE and get a quadratic in gamma. This has two possible solutions.1) gamma =0. This is always possible2) gamma =1-(2\alpha\mu)/(\sigma*\sigma) This is possible when 2\alpha\mu/(\sigma*\sigma) <1.To ensure only one solution is ever possible require gamma \ge 2\alpha\mu/(\sigma*\sigma).
 
User avatar
prospero
Posts: 1
Joined: March 16th, 2002, 4:00 am

CIR model and the Feller condition

June 8th, 2008, 11:18 am

Also given in Proposition 6.2.4 of Lamberton and Lapeyre's book