September 28th, 2008, 6:33 pm
I'm having trouble reading the picture, but it looks as if you have PACF charts on the left and ACF on the right. The first rule is to look at the simpler one.On the top line, the PACF is simpler. There is only interaction at lag one, every other lag just has the correlation implied by the one-lag effect. So (1,0,0) seems right.On the second line, the ACF is simpler. There are interactions at lags one and two, but none at other lags, not even the ones implied by the one and two lag effect. So (0,0,2) seems right.These are perfect charts for simple cases. Do you see the logic for these? If not, I can explain it If so, do you have a problem with messier charts and more complicated models?