January 16th, 2009, 8:57 pm
I don't like it as a general approach. It assumes that correlation is a random walk, which I do not find to be a good model for the price movements of financial securities. I prefer models that assume the correlation change is either a regime shift, or the effect of a hidden variable.If you are willing to assume correlation is a random walk, that's a reasonable simple way to estimate it. Simple is good, because it's virtually impossible to distinguish among models. But be sure you test it before you use it. If it doesn't work in the past, it probably won't work in the future. If it does work in the past, it still probably won't work in the future, but you have a better shot.