June 17th, 2010, 12:05 pm
QuoteOriginally posted by: kiwimanBesides, do you really think that if you worked with someone famous and published articles of note it really matters where you did it?I don't. At all. But this a good point. Suppose you've just started working in a famous group. They are going to publish a paper on PNAS, they give you their outcomes asking you to make all the graphs. Of course you do it and they put your name as co-author. Hence you have a publication on a very important review having done nothing but something anybody could do. It happens. To my experience, if you are a PhD student publishing barely depends on you. It depends much more on the publishing drive of your supervisor, which may be close to zero (sure + fixed income = relax). You have far more probabilities to publish, making graphs for your boss than achieving your own results: he won't take the time to read your drafts. You may finish your PhD with your thesis, a couple of preprints on arxiv.org and a proceeding from a conference. I got my PhD in Italy. It was a great experience from a personal viewpoint, but frustrating for what concern productivity.Do they rely on publications so much?Thanks all for your answers!
Last edited by
bovinad on June 16th, 2010, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.