June 28th, 2003, 3:30 am
Realization of the self is understanding the source of where all things spring forth. It's not so funny if you consider that science can never approach an understanding of what really is. If you trust your physical senses, you can only ever know the world that exists in relation to those senses, which themselves only exist in the framework of the things perceived by the senses. It is in essence a big circular loop. Yet, we take for granted that the world has physicality, and we trust that the senses were designed to 'capture' the essential features of that physicality. When really, all we know, hear, or see is always the experience of a group of senses which themselves cannot be shown to have independent existence from the objects of perception.The proof is in the pudding as they say -- so tell me then, if everything that we can ever know is a function of our sensory organs, and these sensory organs create a picture of the world (i.e., the senses taken together provide a 'feature space' if you will) and these are integrated in the mind, well then the only thing you can ever really know is whatever is the picture/sounds/etc. that you have in your mind (i.e., you can't know what is actually in the world, only the world that exists IN your mental space) -- so where then is your independent verification that what is in your mind, is really what is "out there"? All that exists IS the mental map of the world -- there is no independent proof that a 'world' really exists, if you will. Self-realization consists partly of experiencing that which lies beyond the map -- that is, we must ask "who observes the map?" The answer is "the Self".Think on this deeply and you'll start to realize that there may be a point to self-realization afterall.You should read up more on the teachings of Ramana Maharshi. Google him.