March 14th, 2012, 6:48 pm
Yes, I usually sort them too. But in this case, I choose rotation for the first three (ABD,BCA,CAB), a reflection of the triangle (from ABC to ACB), and then rotations for the last three (ACB, CBA, BAC). That seemed more elegant in this geometric context because the permutations of the triangle could be defined by geometric operators of rotation and reflection.Here's how I got 8 instead of 4. Ignoring the permutation aspect (assuming ABC==BCA==CAB==ACB==CBA==BAC), I get 8 different spherical triangles because each AB, AC and BC edge can be independently chosen as either the shortest great-circle distance or the longest great-circle distance. Admittedly, this creates some strange spherical triangles.Come to think, some of the 8 figures constructed in this way are probably not valid because if you have more than one of the long great-circle edges, they will intersect on the backside of the sphere. So we are now down to 4 triangles. And yet every one of the 4 has a complementary spherical triangle. For example triangle ABC with angles a, b, and c has a spherical complement triangle with angles 2π-a, 2π-b, and 2π-c. So we're back to 8, again.